In his 2021 book, Raffensperger criticized Trump’s behavior on the call at length. He offered no defense of Trump’s conduct. When he was then asked about the call in a Fox interview about the op-ed, he said he had done due diligence before the call and knew that Trump’s various fraud claims were unfounded. Raffensperger published an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal in early September criticizing efforts to use the 14th Amendment to get Trump disqualified from the 2024 ballot on the grounds that Trump engaged in an insurrection or rebellion against the US – Raffensperger argued that “denying voters the opportunity to choose is fundamentally un-American” – but Raffensperger didn’t even mention the call in that op-ed. (Meadows had asked if, “in the spirit of cooperation and compromise,” they could “at least have a discussion” to seek a “less litigious” path forward.) That Raffensperger remark was in response to a question that was solely about Meadows’ words, not Trump’s words.

Rather, Raffensperger testified that “I didn’t take it as inappropriate” when Meadows told him on the January 2021 call that he (Meadows) hoped they could reach an agreement to allow the Trump side to look more fully at the election data. Nowhere in Raffensperger’s testimony did he say Trump didn’t do anything wrong or defend Trump’s words. Trump did not specify what he was talking about, but it’s possible he was mischaracterizing Raffensperger’s testimony at a late-August court hearing on the attempt by former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to get his own Georgia criminal case moved from state court to federal court. Raffensperger did not say Trump didn’t do anything wrong on the January 2021 call Raffensperger has been sharply critical of Trump’s behavior on the call. But he said last week, I didn’t do anything wrong.”įacts First: Trump’s claim is false. He said, ‘That was a negotiation.’ Brad Raffensperger, who I was dealing with, I appreciate that he said that. Trump said: “Brad Raffensperger, the head – who, by the way, last week said I didn’t do anything wrong. Trump, who is facing criminal charges over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election defeat in Georgia, defended the January 2021 phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in which Trump told numerous lies about supposed election fraud and pressured Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to give him a victory in the state. That is simply not the same as killing the baby. There are some cases in which parents decide to choose palliative care for babies who are born with deadly conditions that give them just minutes, hours or days to live. Since its passage, however, it has been the subject of online misinformation falsely claiming it does. Killing a child after birth is not allowed in any state, and New York did not pass legislation permitting infanticide.Ī law New York approved in 2019 makes abortion illegal after 24 weeks with the exception of cases where the fetus is not viable or the abortion is “necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.” The law does not legalize post-birth murder. Trump, attacking Democrats on abortion policy, claimed, “You have some states that are allowed to kill the child after birth.” He also said specifically, “You have New York state and other places that passed legislation where you’re allowed to kill the baby after birth.”įacts First: This is false. This is not a comprehensive list of the inaccurate remarks Trump made in the interview. Here’s a fact check of 14 of the false claims, plus a check on another important claim for which there is no evidence. The show’s new moderator, Kristen Welker, promptly corrected some of the false claims others were aired unchallenged. Former President Donald Trump delivered a laundry list of his familiar election lies and other false claims – plus some new falsehoods on subjects ranging from abortion laws to his policy on dealing with drug cartels – in an interview that aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Donald trump mocks handicap reporter